The history of a legal system dates back to the times of the Old Testament with Mosaic Law and to the terms of Napoleons Napoleonic Laws. The actors roles in the legal system have through work over time been changing to fit their times. In the past, complainants and respondents could argue their cases beforehand a judge themselves. Today each party is plausibly to take lawyers to argue their cases for them. In the iniquitous justice system, prosecutors who atomic number 18 funded by the government represent the people, and self-abnegation reaction lawyers who are privately paying(a) or paid by the government represent the accused. In his book, Ericson argues that through time in Canada the accused has played accurate little to no role in his own defence and depends entirely on his lawyer who makes his living in the execrable justice system. Because of this, he argues that the accused is more of a bloodsucking than a defendant. For Ericson this is a problem and he sh ows facts about wherefore the Canadian Justice System needs to be reformed. bingle of the of import themes in Ericsons book is that the accused does non inhabit the amplify of the criminal justice system and therefore is completely conditional on his lawyer to secure his future.
The way Ericson puts it, it seems as though he sees the criminal justice system as other(prenominal) knowledge domain, where police, judges, prosecutors and defence attorneys live and conduct their everyday lives and even enunciate another language. When the police arrest an accused, he is pulled into that world, which he does not know anything about, and is dependant on his lawyer to get him out o! f that world or negotiate a settlement so that he can get out as briefly as possible. In that different world, the actors are familiar with each... If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.